[VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.20.0 (candidate 0)

[Nigel Daley]

It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a
release!

I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.

***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
April 14.***

http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/

Should we release this?

Nigel

[Devaraj Das]

Should HADOOP-5655 be a blocker for the release? It's a testcase bug.


On 4/9/09 11:07 AM, "Nigel Daley" <ndaley-ZXvpkYn067l8UrSeD/***@public.gmane.org> wrote:

It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a
release!

I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.

***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
April 14.***

http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/

Should we release this?

Nigel

[Nigel Daley]

Post by Devaraj Das
Should HADOOP-5655 be a blocker for the release? It's a testcase bug.

No IMO.

Post by Devaraj Das
Should HADOOP-5655 be a blocker for the release? It's a testcase bug.
It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a
release!
I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
April 14.***
http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Nigel

[Tom White]

+1

Based on running a few programs on a 10 node cluster.

Tom

It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a release!
I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday, April
14.***
http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Nigel

[Dhruba Borthakur]

+1.

-dhruba

Post by Tom White
+1
Based on running a few programs on a 10 node cluster.
Tom

Post by Nigel Daley
It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a

release!

Post by Nigel Daley
I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday, April
14.***
http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Enigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/>
Should we release this?
Nigel

[Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze]

What is the vote status? What should we do for committing patches to 0.20.x?

Nicholas Sze

Post by Nigel Daley

Post by Nigel Daley

Post by Nigel Daley
It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a

release!

Post by Nigel Daley
I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday, April
14.***

http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/

Post by Nigel Daley

Post by Nigel Daley
Should we release this?
Nigel

[Nigel Daley]

Sorry, just getting back from vacation. I'll wrap up the vote.

Nige

Post by Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze
What is the vote status? What should we do for committing patches to 0.20.x?
Nicholas Sze

Post by Nigel Daley

Post by Nigel Daley

Post by Nigel Daley
It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a

release!

Post by Nigel Daley
I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday, April
14.***

http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/

Post by Nigel Daley

Post by Nigel Daley
Should we release this?
Nigel

[Nigel Daley]

+1 from me, Tom, and Dhruba. Vote passes. I'll push out the release.

Nige

Post by Nigel Daley
It's been 4 months since Hadoop 0.20.0 feature freeze...time for a
release!
I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.20.0.
***Please download and test it before the vote closes on Tuesday,
April 14.***
http://people.apache.org/~nigel/hadoop-0.20.0-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Nigel

[markus3000]

Hi, please note

javac -classpath /hadoop/hadoop-0.20.0-core.jar WordCount.java

gives error

WordCount.java:69: cannot access org.apache.commons.cli.Options
class file for org.apache.commons.cli.Options not found
String[] otherArgs = new GenericOptionsParser(conf,
args).getRemainingArg

Corresponding command works fine with 0.18.3 and 0.19.1

thanks